🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding System and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.