🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.